This is a short video shooting story of "do not die." In order to shoot the spoof video traffic, a couple of lovers in Wuhan mixed their animal waste with the urine of the person to make the manure, which was not prepared for the innocent passers-by. On the evening of June 30, Ms. Zhou was unfortunately recruited at the exit of the Shilipu subway station in Hanyang. The Hanyang police then arrested the two and verified five crimes. The two men have been arrested for allegedly seeking trouble.
The flow is above and the bottom line is completely absent. Self-sufficiency, sin is the best. In the middle of the night, I ran to the subway station to rush the lady to pour the manure. After committing the crime, I ran and shot the spoof video. The choice of the time point, the choice of the object of the crime, the preparation for the division of labor, and the fact that “the crime is 5” is enough to show the suspect. The evil of human criminal behavior. The actions of the couple in Wuhan have long been nothing but a moral ambiguity that can be lenient, but a legal issue that is both right and wrong. Of course, the judiciary will give this event a fair conclusion. It is worth noting that in today's spoof short video, the "creation" of these spicy eyes and ruined three views has been criticized countless times and countless times. Why are they being imitated and sought after by countless people?
It is conceivable that, just like those "three vulgar" anchors who try to practice the law, these short video creators who do not live for the sake of traffic are not expected to throw "not knowing the law or knowing the law" after the incident. An excuse. These reasons may be justified, but if you really think that this is a harmless joke, why do you run away when you commit the crime? What is more worthy to ask is, why are producers who are obviously suspected of breaking the law and never worry about “no broadcast”? These two problems are actually two sides of a coin: there is a bottom line, there are some, the public order is good, but the short video APP field is a group of magical dances. After the bad money drives out the good money, it is the fact that it encourages and smashes this kind of "splashing". "Drug" illegal "performance".xxAbove the bottom line, there is compliance and diversity in short video creation. Regrettably, the platform side as the main responsible person seems to be always neglected. For example, a series of "dance elevators and other me" break dance videos were madly transmitted on the Internet, young people in the video, or a few people jumping together in the elevator, or extending their hands and feet to prevent the elevator doors from closing, or It was retrograde on the escalator, and even carried out a fork. A series of dangerous actions made people feel scared. In order to outrageous and dangerous blogs, the illegal or trivial pursuit of traffic, the platform does not ask, even the classification highlights so "realizable" logic, it is no wonder that the public wants to condemn some short video software "lower the collective intelligence of the people."
In the past two years, short videos have sprung up, and they have already surpassed the live broadcast. The 43rd《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》shows that as of December 2018, the number of Internet users in China was 829 million, while the number of short video users reached 648 million, and the user utilization rate was 78.2%. The short video users are mainly based on the youth group,《2019中国网络视听发展研究报告》shows that among the loyal users of short videos, the group under the age of 30 accounts for nearly 70%, and the group of students in the school accounts for nearly 40%. The proportion of teen users in the short video platform is already much higher than most Internet products.
Based on the above background, it is necessary to strengthen the main responsibility and daily routine of the short video APP platform. This is like a network car accident, the platform can not be the same as the hand, the short video APP platform has to follow the basic logic of "no diamonds do not take porcelain live". It is more straightforward to say that if the short video of "splashing the feces" can be spread on the mobile APP, it should not be just about talking about it, but should directly remove the software indefinitely and determine its legal responsibility.